# Foreign Casinos for UK Players: Licensing and Risks
::: hero-subtitle
Foreign casinos sit outside the UKGC system, so licensing, dispute routes, payments and self-exclusion can differ from UK-regulated sites.
:::
## What “Foreign Casino” Means in the UK
In the UK market, a foreign casino is an online gambling operator that accepts British customers but does not hold a licence from the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC). The word “foreign” can sound as if it refers simply to where a company is based. Here, the more useful distinction is regulatory: the operator is outside the UKGC licensing system.
That means a site can have an overseas address, a licence issued elsewhere and games available to British visitors, yet still count as a foreign casino in this sense. Its offshore licence is not a UKGC licence. The two are not interchangeable, and an overseas regulator does not make the operator UKGC-regulated.
You may also see these sites described as [offshore casinos or non-GamStop casinos](/casino-sites/best-offshore-casinos-for-uk-players/). Those labels are commonly used in the same part of the market, but they do not tell you everything about an operator. “Offshore” points to its position outside the UK’s licensing framework; “non-GamStop” signals that it is outside the UK self-exclusion scheme. Neither phrase means the site is licensed by the UKGC.
::: top-operators
When considering foreign casinos as a UK player in 2026, payout timing is one practical detail to check. Use this list to see which operators have a stated withdrawal timeframe.
### 1. Zombillion
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
You can expect a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days at Zombillion.
—
### 2. Dieselwin
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
Dieselwin lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days for you to consider.
—
### 3. BeOnBet
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
BeOnBet’s stated payout speed is 1–3 business days.
—
### 4. SpinFormula
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
You’ll find a listed payout speed of 1–3 business days at SpinFormula.
—
### 5. Jetsetspins
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
Jetsetspins states a payout speed of 1–3 business days.
—
### 6. NightWin
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
NightWin lists payouts as taking 1–3 business days.
—
### 7. WinBeast
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
WinBeast’s stated payout speed is 1–3 business days, giving you a timeframe to note.
—
### 8. x3bet
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
You can take x3bet’s listed payout speed of 1–3 business days into account.
—
### 9. Chanze
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
Chanze states a payout speed of 1–3 business days.
—
### 10. Revery Play
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
Revery Play lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days for you to consider.
:::
The distinction matters because a licence is specific to the regulator that issued it. An operator may display a foreign licence or describe itself as licensed and regulated, but that does not change its status in Britain. If it does not hold a UKGC licence, it remains outside the Commission’s regulatory system, whatever overseas credentials it may cite.
I find it helps to separate three ideas that often get bundled together: where a company is based, which regulator issued its licence, and whether it holds a UKGC licence. The first two may tell you something about the business and its home jurisdiction. For the definition used here, the third is decisive. A company’s name, website design or choice of games does not alter that distinction.
This also explains why “foreign casino” is not a description of a particular style of gambling site. It does not, by itself, say whether the operator offers slots, table games or live dealer games, or what payment methods it accepts. Those details can vary between operators. The term only identifies the relevant licensing relationship with the UK market.
A British player looking for a foreign casino may encounter sites that present an offshore licence prominently. Treat that as a claim about regulation outside the UK, not as evidence of UKGC oversight. The Commission’s name and an overseas authority’s name refer to different regulators, with different jurisdictions. A licence from one does not stand in for a licence from the other.
$$LINKCARD usa-casinos-for-uk-players$$
So when you come across “[foreign casinos for UK players](/casino-sites/best-international-casinos-for-uk-players/)”, read it as a description of overseas-licensed operators that take British customers without a UK Gambling Commission licence. It is not a stamp of approval, nor a promise about how a site operates. It is a category based on the operator’s licensing position.
That is the baseline. The label tells you what kind of operator you are looking at; it does not settle every other question about the site.
## The Legal Line: The Operator’s Duties and Your Position
The legal distinction is between the business taking your bet and you placing it. In England, Scotland and Wales, an online gambling operator must [hold a licence from the UK Gambling Commission](https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/guidance/guidance-to-licensing-authorities/part-1-primary-legislation) if it offers gambling services to customers there. That requirement applies even when the company is based abroad. A licence issued by an overseas regulator does not replace a UKGC licence.
So a casino can be licensed where it is based and still lack permission to serve customers in Great Britain. The relevant question is not simply whether the site has a licence, but whether it holds the licence required for the market it is serving. Foreign online casinos may describe themselves as licensed, but that description does not make them UKGC-regulated.
For the operator, offering gambling to British customers without the required UKGC licence is illegal. The legal obligation sits with the business providing the service. It cannot avoid that obligation merely by locating its company or servers overseas, or by holding a licence from another jurisdiction. If it is offering gambling to people in England, Scotland or Wales, the UK licensing requirement still applies.
::: danger-callout Legal Risk
Offering gambling services to British customers without a UKGC licence is illegal for the operator, regardless of where the business is based.
:::
That is the operator’s side of the line. Your position as a player is different. There is no law in the United Kingdom that makes it a criminal offence for an individual to place a bet with an overseas casino. The Gambling Act does not turn the player’s decision to use a foreign operator into a crime, and there is no criminal penalty for the player simply for doing so.
I find this distinction easy to lose in broad statements such as “foreign casinos are illegal”. That wording mixes up two separate things: the operator’s duty to obtain permission to serve the market, and the player’s choice to place a bet. The operator may be breaking the rules by providing gambling to British customers without a UKGC licence; that does not mean the customer commits an offence by using the site.
It also helps to separate “licensed abroad” from “licensed in the UK”. They are not interchangeable labels. An overseas licence may indicate that a regulator elsewhere has authorised the business under its own rules. It does not grant the operator permission under the British system. For a person comparing online casinos outside the UK, the existence of an offshore licence answers a different question from whether the operator has UKGC authorisation.
The word “foreign” can make the issue sound like a matter of geography: a company is based elsewhere, therefore a different set of rules applies. But the location of the operator does not remove the UK requirement when it offers gambling to customers in Great Britain. The duty follows the service being offered into this market, not just the address on the company’s website.
$$LINKCARD gibraltar-casino-licence-uk$$
This does not mean that every detail of a player’s relationship with an offshore operator is settled by the simple fact that the player is not committing a crime. It means only that the player does not incur criminal liability merely by placing a bet with an overseas operator. The operator’s licensing position remains its own legal problem, and the absence of a player offence should not be read as approval or endorsement of the site.
A quick way to keep the distinction straight is to ask two separate questions. First: does the operator hold the UK Gambling Commission licence required to offer gambling to customers in Great Britain? Second: is the individual committing an offence merely by choosing an overseas site? The answer to the first depends on the operator’s authorisation; the answer to the second is no.
That is the legal line. The company’s permission to serve the market and your personal liability are not the same issue. A foreign casino without a UKGC licence may be offering its services unlawfully, while a British player who places a bet there is not, on that account alone, breaking the law. The distinction is narrow, but important.
## Why Some Overseas Sites Still Let UK Visitors In
A site loading on your phone can look like a simple yes or no: you can reach it, so it must be willing to take your custom. That is not a safe conclusion. Access controls and an operator’s legal position are separate things, and a website that appears open to British visitors is not necessarily authorised to serve them.
$$LINKCARD best-casino-app-uk$$
Some casinos licensed outside the UK are supposed to prevent visitors from Britain from using their services. But a report by gambling.com says that [some do not enforce this restriction](https://www.gambling.com/uk/news/leak-exposes-owners-of-thousands-of-offshore-casinos), and that visitors may get around it with a basic VPN. That is a report about what people can encounter, not proof that every overseas site behaves this way or that access will remain available.
The distinction matters because the block is not always the first thing you see. A site might load its home page, display games or let you begin registration, while still being intended to exclude British customers. Conversely, being able to access a page does not show that the operator has permission to offer gambling here. A technical door left open is not a licence.
A VPN can change the apparent location of your internet connection, which may affect what a site displays or allows you to open. But getting past an access restriction does not alter the operator’s status. It also does not turn the site into a UK-licensed casino. I would not treat a workaround as a sign that the service is meant for you; it tells you only that a particular barrier did not stop you at that moment.
### Access is not authorisation
For operators, the relevant issue is not simply where a company is based or which overseas regulator issued its licence. If a site provides gambling facilities to customers in England, Scotland or Wales, it must hold the relevant licence from the UK Gambling Commission. An offshore licence is not a substitute for that permission.
The same applies if the site is easy to find, accepts a British address during registration or appears in a list of foreign [casino sites](/casino-sites/) accepting UK players. Those details describe availability, not compliance. A site can be technically reachable while still lacking the authorisation required to provide gambling to customers in Great Britain.
Advertising is a separate part of the same boundary. An operator without a UK Gambling Commission licence cannot lawfully advertise its gambling services in the UK or provide gambling facilities to UK customers. A page being visible to you does not mean its promotion or service is lawful. The practical experience of encountering a site should not be mistaken for official approval.
That is why broad labels such as “open to UK players” can be misleading. They may refer to what a visitor can see or do on a site, rather than whether the operator is entitled to offer the service here. Even if a site accepts a sign-up, that does not resolve the licensing question. The awkward gap between access and authorisation is the point.
### Why the gap can persist
Blocking visitors is a technical measure, and technical measures can be imperfect or inconsistently applied. The report from gambling.com describes sites that are supposed to block British visitors but do not always do so, as well as the possibility of bypassing a restriction using a VPN. It does not establish that every non-UK casino accepts British customers, or that any particular site will continue to do so.
Access can also be misunderstood when a visitor sees only part of the journey. Opening a page is not the same as being permitted to gamble there; reaching a sign-up form is not confirmation that a site has checked whether it can serve you. The visible experience can therefore be more permissive than the operator’s stated restriction—or simply fail to tell you anything clear about its intended market.
::: pre-bet-checklist Assessing Foreign Casinos
– [ ] Check if the site can be reached without a VPN
– [ ] Verify if registration and gambling are actually permitted
– [ ] Confirm whether the operator holds a UK Gambling Commission licence
:::
If you are assessing a foreign casino accepting UK visitors, separate three questions: can you reach the site, does it actually allow you to register and gamble, and does the operator hold a UK Gambling Commission licence for serving British customers? The first two are about what happens on the website. The last is about the operator’s authority. They are not interchangeable.
That distinction also applies to claims that a casino is among the best foreign online casinos accepting UK players. An accolade, a working page or a successful visit cannot establish UKGC regulation. Nor does an overseas licence do so. The relevant point is whether the operator holds the British licence required to serve customers here.
A site that appears accessible may still have been meant to block you; a block that fails does not give the operator permission. Keep those two facts apart when judging what you have found. A page loading is just a page loading.
## Before You Sign Up, Check What Happens If a Payout Goes Wrong
A balance on your screen is not the same as money in your bank account. With an offshore casino, the important test comes when you ask to withdraw: the operator controls the account process, and it is not regulated by the UK Gambling Commission. If a dispute arises, you do not have the same UKGC route for raising it as you would with a UK-licensed operator.
That matters because a payout can become a disagreement about the operator’s rules. A site may point to its terms, question whether a requirement has been met or keep a withdrawal pending while it checks your account. Those details do not prove that a refusal is fair. They do mean you should understand what the operator says it can do before you deposit, rather than trying to work it out after a win.
The risk is not merely theoretical. Gambling.com has reported cases in which unlicensed sites [refused to pay winnings](https://www.gambling.com/uk/news/leak-exposes-owners-of-thousands-of-offshore-casinos) and customers were left without legal recourse. That is not a claim that every offshore casino behaves this way; it is a reminder that recovering money can be difficult when a dispute involves an operator outside the UKGC system. A complaint to the site may not lead to the outcome you want, and you may have limited practical options if it does not.
### Read the withdrawal rules before depositing
Look for the withdrawal conditions, not just the deposit instructions. Check whether the site states withdrawal limits, pending periods and verification procedures, and whether those rules differ by payment method or account status. A specialist review notes that these conditions can vary considerably between operators, so do not assume that one site’s process tells you what another will do.
Pay attention to wording that gives the operator discretion to delay or refuse a payment. Make sure you can find the full terms, not just a short summary beside a cashier button. If the rules are vague, hard to locate or inconsistent across the site, treat that as a reason to pause. A large balance does not make unclear terms clearer.
::: dos-donts
#### Do
– Read full withdrawal conditions before depositing
– Keep copies of terms and account messages
– Set a firm personal budget
—
#### Don’t
– Assume deposit instructions mirror withdrawal rules
– Trust vague or hard-to-locate terms
– Treat promised payouts as available money
:::
Keep copies of the terms and your account messages when you sign up or request a withdrawal. That will not guarantee a payment or settle a dispute, but it can help you keep track of what the operator said and when. If the site changes its wording, having a record may also make it easier to describe the issue accurately.
One point is easy to miss: offshore casinos do not provide UKGC-mandated affordability checks. Those checks are part of the UK regulatory framework, not a protection you should expect from a site operating outside it. The absence of that safeguard can make it easier to keep gambling without the same UKGC oversight. Set a firm budget yourself, and do not treat a promised payout as available money until it has actually reached you.
Before you create an account, ask yourself whether you could accept the possibility of a delayed or disputed withdrawal without relying on the UKGC to intervene. If the answer is no, do not deposit. The terms matter; so does the route available if the terms are not followed.
## Security Claims Aren’t the Same as UKGC Protection
When you look at foreign casino sites, security language can sound reassuring: encryption, protected payments, an offshore licence. Those claims concern different things, though. Encryption is a technical safeguard for information; a gambling licence is a regulator’s permission and framework. Neither phrase, on its own, tells you that a site is regulated by the UK Gambling Commission.
Some [non-GamStop casino operators](/casino-sites/trusted-casinos-not-on-gamstop-uk/) describe encryption as a way to protect personal and financial information. That is relevant to how data is handled, but it does not tell you what happens if the operator makes a decision you disagree with, or what player-protection standards apply to the account. Security is not one big switch marked “safe”. It has separate parts.
I’d read the wording carefully. Does the site make a specific statement about encryption, or does it simply use broad terms such as “secure” and “protected”? A technical claim should not be stretched into a promise about every part of the service. Encryption may help protect information; it does not make an offshore operator subject to UKGC oversight.
### What an offshore licence tells you
A foreign casino may display a licence from an authority outside the UK. That tells you the operator is licensed offshore, not that it holds a UK Gambling Commission licence. The distinction matters even where the licence is presented alongside polished security language.
Some specialist reviews describe non-GamStop casinos as licensed and regulated by reputable overseas authorities. Treat that as a description of the licensing claim, not as proof that the operator meets UKGC standards. A regulator’s name and a licence number may help you identify the stated jurisdiction, but they do not turn an offshore licence into a British one.
The same applies to phrases such as “compliant with applicable laws”. They need context: which authority, which licence, and which market? A general statement does not establish that the site is regulated for British customers. Offshore casinos are not regulated by the UK Gambling Commission, and their protections should not be presented as equivalent to those at UKGC-licensed operators.
That is the point worth keeping in view when comparing non-UK casino sites for UK players. A page can discuss encryption and a licence without answering what standards govern the service you are using. Separate the claims instead of letting one reassuring badge stand in for all the others.
### What security language cannot promise
A secure connection and careful handling of data are worthwhile, but they do not guarantee fair treatment in every account matter. Nor do they give you the UKGC’s player-protection standards or put the operator under UKGC enforcement. Those are regulatory questions, not encryption questions.
There is another practical difference: offshore operators do not offer UKGC-mandated affordability checks. That absence is not a security feature. It means you should not read a smooth sign-up process or a statement about protecting your details as evidence that the operator applies the same safeguards as a UK-licensed site. A quiet process can feel convenient; it does not tell you much about the protections behind it.
This matters whether you arrive looking for foreign slots in the UK or simply want to browse [casino sites outside the UK](/casino-sites/non-uk-regulated-casino/). Game choice and data security are separate from the rules that govern the operator. A page featuring familiar games or a wide selection does not alter the status of its licence.
If you are assessing a security claim, keep the questions narrow. What information does the operator say it protects? What offshore authority does it name? Does the wording clearly distinguish that licence from UKGC regulation? If it blurs those points, don’t fill in the gaps on its behalf.
I would not dismiss encryption claims; protecting personal and financial information matters. I would also not let them do more work than they can. An offshore licence may regulate an operator under another jurisdiction, and encryption may address data protection. Neither means the site is UKGC-regulated, and neither provides the same player-protection standards. Different claims. Different limits.
## Big Welcome Offers: Read the Wagering Before the Headline
A large welcome banner tells you what the casino wants you to notice. The wagering terms tell you what you would have to do before bonus funds can be withdrawn. Read both before accepting an offer from [non-UK casino sites accepting UK players](/casino-sites/best-offshore-casino-sites/).
A specialist review describes deposit matches, free spins, no-deposit bonuses and cashback as common formats at foreign casinos serving UK customers. Each works differently: a match adds bonus funds alongside a deposit; free spins are tied to selected games; a no-deposit offer does not require an initial payment; and cashback returns a stated share of qualifying losses under the offer’s terms. None of those labels tells you whether the bonus is easy to use.
Specialist reviews also report that overseas welcome packages can be larger because these operators are not bound by UKGC restrictions on bonus terms, wagering requirements and promotional language. A bigger headline is not automatically better value. Check which games count, whether there is a deadline, what maximum bet applies while the bonus is active, and whether the requirement applies to the bonus alone or to the bonus and deposit. The answer is in the terms, not the banner.
Here is the arithmetic: one specialist review uses a 100% match on a £100 deposit with a 35x wagering requirement. That produces £100 in bonus funds, but the player must place £3,500 in qualifying bets before those funds become withdrawable. The figure is the required betting turnover, not a promise that you will get your stake back or finish ahead.
::: worked-example Bonus Calculation
### Step 1: Identify the bonus
A 100% match on a £100 deposit provides £100 in bonus funds.
### Step 2: Apply wagering requirements
With a 35x wagering requirement, the calculation is £100 × 35.
### Step 3: Determine required turnover
The player must place £3,500 in qualifying bets before funds are withdrawable.
:::
I would treat the bonus as money you may never be able to withdraw, until you have checked every condition. Also remember that offshore casinos are not regulated by the UK Gambling Commission and do not provide UKGC-mandated affordability checks. Those safeguards are not replaced by a generous promotion.
If you accept an offer, save its terms and check how the casino handles excluded games, withdrawals during wagering and any cap on winnings. If the wording is unclear, skip it. A bonus you cannot explain back to yourself is not a bargain.
## Getting Your Money Out: Methods, Timing and Delays
The payment method can make a noticeable difference to the wait, but the displayed processing time is only part of the story. On overseas casino sites, check whether the stated estimate begins when you request a withdrawal or after the operator has approved it. A pending period, internal processing or a request for identity documents can add time.
Skrill and Neteller are among the quicker options described for foreign casinos: most are reported to clear these [withdrawals within 24 hours](/casino-sites/best-instant-withdrawal-casinos-uk/), with many handling them in under 12. That is the operator-side estimate, not a promise that the money will appear in your account at once. I’d check the cashier terms for any pending stage before choosing a method.
Bank transfers tend to take longer. A specialist review reports that they can take five to seven business days, with some casinos adding their own processing time before the bank transfer even begins. Weekends and bank handling can make the calendar wait feel longer than the stated business-day estimate.
Crypto is sometimes presented as the quickest route. A specialist review reports that withdrawals can clear in under an hour, but the value of the currency can move while you hold it. Speed is not the only thing to weigh: you may receive a different sterling value by the time you convert it.
Before depositing, read the withdrawal rules as carefully as the deposit options. Limits, pending periods and verification steps differ between operators, and a fast method does not remove those checks. UKGC-licensed operators must verify identity before processing a withdrawal; an offshore site is not overseen by the UK Gambling Commission, so do not assume UKGC standards apply. Offshore operators also do not provide UKGC-mandated affordability checks.
If a casino asks for documents, make sure you understand what it needs and how to submit them through its official account process. Keep a record of your request and the terms shown at the time. The timings above are reported estimates, not a guarantee that a payout will arrive by a particular point. That distinction matters.
## The Business Ties Behind Some Offshore Gambling
A casino brand is not always the whole business. The companies behind it can have commercial relationships that are less obvious than the name on the homepage, and those ties can shape who benefits when customers gamble.
Santeda offers a clear example. Its Curaçao licence does not authorise it to operate in the UK or the US. Under a contract with Santeda, SIS received a percentage of revenue generated by losing bets placed through Santeda’s brands. That is a direct financial link between SIS and gambling losses on those brands.
The detail matters, but it should not be stretched. It does not, by itself, tell you what SIS did day to day, whether it owned the casino brands, or how any individual customer was treated. Nor does a commercial arrangement turn an offshore licence into UK Gambling Commission approval. These are separate questions.
When I look at a corporate tie like this, I treat it as context, not a shortcut to a verdict. It helps show that offshore gambling can involve several businesses with different roles and financial interests. A familiar company name somewhere in that chain is not the same as a recommendation, a guarantee of standards, or UKGC oversight.
For anyone comparing foreign casino brands, the useful point is simple: look beyond the front-facing name when ownership or contractual relationships are disclosed. Then keep the roles clear. A revenue-sharing arrangement tied to losing bets is meaningful; it is not proof of every claim that might be made about the companies involved.
That distinction is worth keeping in view. A brand is only one part of the picture.
## Do UK Players Pay Tax on Overseas Casino Winnings?
No. Gambling winnings are not subject to income tax in the UK, whether they come from a UK Gambling Commission-licensed operator or an overseas casino. The operator’s location or licensing status does not change the tax treatment of the winnings.
That answers the tax question, but it is worth keeping it separate from other questions about an overseas site. Tax-free does not mean the site is UKGC-regulated, nor does it tell you whether a withdrawal will be handled properly. Those are separate matters.
I’d also avoid treating a casino balance as money you have already won and received. Until a payout reaches you, it remains subject to the operator’s own processes. Once you do receive gambling winnings, the UK income-tax position is the same regardless of whether the casino is based here or abroad.
There is no special income-tax charge simply because you played with an overseas operator. The short version is simple: the winnings themselves are not taxable income in the UK. Keep that point in its lane, though; it is a tax answer, not an endorsement of any particular casino or a guarantee about what happens to your account.
## GamStop and Non-UK Casinos: Know What Self-Exclusion Won’t Cover
GamStop is designed to block access across every operator licensed by the UK Gambling Commission. Once you register, that exclusion applies across UK-licensed gambling sites; it is not a separate request you must make to each casino.
Non-UK casinos sit outside that system. Because they are not under the UKGC’s remit, they are [not required to check GamStop](/casino-sites/casino-sites-not-registered-with-gamstop-uk/) and may still accept your registration. A specialist review reports that someone who has self-excluded can sign up with a foreign casino in minutes and deposit without the safeguards that come with the exclusion. That is a reported possibility, not a reason to treat it as a safe or dependable route.
I would not use a non-UK casino as a workaround. Self-exclusion is there to create distance from gambling, and moving to a site it does not cover removes that barrier rather than solving the problem. Offshore operators also do not provide UKGC-mandated affordability checks. That matters when the point of excluding yourself is to regain control over spending.
If you have registered with GamStop and feel tempted to look elsewhere, pause before opening an account or depositing. The fact that a site may let you in does not mean it offers the protections you chose when you self-excluded. For help maintaining that boundary, contact a gambling support service such as GamCare, or use a blocking tool such as BetBlocker.
The short version: GamStop covers UK-licensed operators, not foreign casinos. Treat that gap as a risk to avoid, not an invitation.
::: faq
## Are winnings from foreign casinos taxable in the UK?
No. Gambling winnings are not subject to UK income tax, whether the casino is UKGC-licensed or not.
—
## Is playing at an international casino legal for UK residents?
Yes. UK residents are not committing a criminal offence simply by betting with an overseas casino, although an operator needs a UKGC licence to offer gambling to customers in England, Scotland and Wales.
—
## Are gambling winnings subject to income tax in the United Kingdom?
No. Gambling winnings are not subject to income tax in the UK.
—
## What should players check to assess whether an international casino is safe?
Check which regulator, if any, has licensed the casino, and remember that an overseas licence is not UKGC authorisation. Also check its withdrawal limits, pending periods and verification procedures, which vary between operators.
—
## How do I know if an online casino is safe?
Check whether it is licensed and by which regulator; a foreign licence does not mean the casino is regulated by the UKGC. Be aware that customers at unlicensed sites have sometimes been refused their winnings and may have no legal recourse.
—
## Can I play at a casino licensed outside the UK?
Yes. It is not illegal for a British player to place bets with an overseas operator, but an overseas licence does not give that operator permission to offer gambling to customers in Great Britain.
—
## What does wagering requirement actually mean in practice?
It is the amount you must bet on qualifying games before bonus funds can be withdrawn. For example, a 35x requirement on a £20 bonus means £700 in qualifying bets; on a £100 bonus, it means £3,500.
:::
[Responsible Gambling](/play-responsibly/)